🔗 Share this article

Critics have charged British American Tobacco with “complete double standards” for lobbying against anti-smoking regulations in Africa that are already in place in the UK.

Zambian lobbying efforts

A letter obtained by media dispatched by the firm's affiliate in Zambia to the country’s government ministers asks for proposals to prohibit tobacco advertising and sponsorship to be abandoned or delayed.

The tobacco firm seeks amendments to a proposed legislation that include decreasing the suggested dimensions of visual health alerts on cigarette packaging, the removal of restrictions on scented cigarette varieties, and watered-down penalties for any firms breaking the new laws.

Anti-tobacco campaigner response

“Were I in government, I would say that they enable the defense of the British people and sustain the fatalities of the Zambian people,” said Master Chimbala.

Thousands of residents a year die from tobacco-related illnesses, according to World Health Organization estimates.

The advocate mentioned the letter was believed to have been distributed to several government departments and was in distribution within public interest organizations.

Worldwide lobbying patterns

This occurs during broader worries about corporate intervention with public health regulations. Last month, global health authorities raised concerns that the tobacco industry was escalating campaigns to dilute worldwide restrictions.

“There is proof of corporate influence everywhere. Tobacco company fingerprints are on deferred levy rises in Indonesia, halted laws in Zambia and even a weakened declaration at the UN international gathering,” said the tobacco industry watchdog.

Potential consequences

“Should anti-smoking legislation fails to be approved because of this letter, the cost might be borne in human lives who might potentially stop smoking.”

The public health measure being considered by Zambia’s parliament includes regulations surpassing UK legislation by extending coverage to e-cigarettes, and stipulating that graphic health warnings cover 75% of product packaging.

Corporate counter-proposals

Via documentation, BAT suggests this be reduced to less than half “according to global guideline limits”, postponed for minimum twelve months after the legislation is approved.

Global health authorities specifically advises a warning should cover at least fifty percent of the cigarette package face “and aim to cover as much of the primary showing sections as possible”. Across the United Kingdom, warnings need to encompass sixty-five percent of a packet’s front and back.

Scented product controversy

BAT asks for the elimination of comprehensive limitations on scented smoking items, arguing that it would lead smokers to “illicitly sold” products. The corporation recommends restricting fewer varieties of “flavours based on desserts, candy, energy drinks, soft drinks and alcohol drinks”. All flavoured cigarettes have been outlawed across the UK since 2020.

The proposed legislation suggests penalties for multiple violations “varying from a fraction of annual sales to 10 years’ imprisonment”.

Corporate defense

In the letter, the managing director of the Zambian branch claims the corporation is focused on ethical business practices” and “backs the goals of governments to reduce smoking incidence and the connected wellbeing effects” but maintains that “specific rules can have negative and unanticipated results.”

Critic response

The campaigner argued the corporation's recommended amendments would “dilute these regulations so much that the required influence for it to cause long-term change in society will not be achieved”.

The reality that multiple comparable regulations existed in the UK, where the company maintains its main office, was “total double standard”, he said.

“We live in a global village. If I plant tobacco in my property and collect the yield and sell it out – and my family members avoid tobacco, but my neighbour’s children do … to enrich myself and all the subsequent offspring while my community's youth are dying … is in itself absolute spiritual collapse.”

Public health laws in the Britain or other nations had failed to shutter businesses, the advocate mentioned. “Laws don't eliminate the industry. It only protects the people.”

Formal company response

The company representative stated: “BAT Zambia conducts its activities following with applicable local laws. Moreover, the company participates in the nation's lawmaking procedures in line with the appropriate structures which allow for stakeholder participation in regulation development.”

The firm positioned itself as “not against rules”, the representative commented, noting that underage people should be safeguarded against obtaining cigarettes and nicotine.

“We advocate for developing rules to achieve intended population health targets, while acknowledging the spectrum of entitlements and duties on corporations, customers and associated groups,” the representative explained, mentioning that the company's suggestions “mirror the circumstances of the African nation's economy and smoking product business, which encompasses rising levels of illicit trade”.

The nation's ministry of business, commercial affairs and industrial development was approached for comment.